Multidisciplinary Management of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Cardiovascular Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) frequently coexist, increasing the prevalence of both entities and impacting on symptoms and prognosis. CVD should be suspected in patients with COPD who have high/very high risk scores on validated scales, frequent exacerbations, precordial pain, disproportionate dyspnea, or palpitations. They should be referred to cardiology if they have palpitations of unknown cause or angina pain. COPD should be suspected in patients with CVD if they have recurrent bronchitis, cough and expectoration, or disproportionate dyspnea. They should be referred to a pulmonologist if they have rhonchi or wheezing, air trapping, emphysema, or signs of chronic bronchitis. Treatment of COPD in cardiovascular patients should include long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMA) or long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) in low-risk or high-risk non-exacerbators, and LAMA/LABA/inhaled corticosteroids in exacerbators who are not controlled with bronchodilators. Cardioselective beta-blockers should be favored in patients with CVD, the long-term need for amiodarone should be assessed, and antiplatelet drugs should be maintained if indicated. (AU)

Multidisciplinary Management of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Cardiovascular Disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) frequently coexist, increasing the prevalence of both entities and impacting on symptoms and prognosis. CVD should be suspected in patients with COPD who have high/very high risk scores on validated scales, frequent exacerbations, precordial pain, disproportionate dyspnea, or palpitations. They should be referred to cardiology if they have palpitations of unknown cause or angina pain. COPD should be suspected in patients with CVD if they have recurrent bronchitis, cough and expectoration, or disproportionate dyspnea. They should be referred to a pulmonologist if they have rhonchi or wheezing, air trapping, emphysema, or signs of chronic bronchitis. Treatment of COPD in cardiovascular patients should include long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMA) or long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) in low-risk or high-risk non-exacerbators, and LAMA/LABA/inhaled corticosteroids in exacerbators who are not controlled with bronchodilators. Cardioselective beta-blockers should be favored in patients with CVD, the long-term need for amiodarone should be assessed, and antiplatelet drugs should be maintained if indicated.

Evolution of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on heart transplant recipients: Decreasing risk, improving perspective.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Heart transplant recipients (HTr) have a higher probability of suffer from severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in comparison to general population, but their risk has changed over the course of the pandemic in relation to various factors. We conducted a prospective study including all HTr at risk of COVID-19 in a tertiary center between February 2020 and October 2022. The aim was to analyze how the prognosis (incidence of pneumonia and mortality) of COVID-19 in HTr has evolved over time, contextualizing variants, vaccination, and other treatments. RESULTS: Of 308 HTr included, 124 got the infection (39.2%). COVID and non-COVID HTr had similar baseline characteristics. COVID-19 patients with pneumonia had a poorer prognosis than those with less severe presentations, with a higher rate of hospitalization (93.3 vs. 14.1%, p < .001) and death (41.0 vs. 1.2%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥60 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-11.49, p = .027), and chronic kidney disease ≥3a (OR 4.95, 95% CI 1.39-17.54, p = .014) as predictors of pneumonia. Two-dose vaccination (OR 0.20, CI 95% 0.05-0.72, p = .02) and early remdesivir administration (OR 0.17, CI 0.03-0.90, p = .037) were protective factors. Over the course of the pandemic considering three periods in the follow-up (prevaccination February-December 2020, postvaccination January-December 2021, and post early remdesivir indication January-October 2022), we observed a reduction in pneumonia incidence from 62% to 19% (p < .001); and mortality (from 23% to 4%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of COVID-19 in HTr has improved over time, likely due to vaccination and early administration of remdesivir.

Clinical Utility of HeartLogic, a Multiparametric Telemonitoring System, in Heart Failure.

Telemonitoring through multiple variables measured on cardiac devices has the potential to improve the follow-up of patients with heart failure. The HeartLogic algorithm (Boston Scientific), implemented in some implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy, allows monitoring of the nocturnal heart rate, respiratory movements, thoracic impedance, physical activity and the intensity of heart tones, with the aim of predicting major clinical events. Although HeartLogic has demonstrated high sensitivity for the detection of heart failure decompensations, its effects on hospitalisation and mortality in randomised clinical trials has not yet been corroborated. This review details how the HeartLogic algorithm works, compiles available evidence from clinical studies, and discusses its application in daily clinical practice.

["Staghorn" heart. The pathology of the explanted heart of a patient with clinical diagnosis and genetic variants of non-compacted myocardiopathy]. / Corazón en «asta de ciervo¼. Estudio anatomopatológico del corazón explantado de una paciente con diagnóstico clínico y variantes genéticas de miocardiopatía no compactada.

Non-compacted myocardiopathy is rare, the prevalence ranging between 0.01-0.26%. in adults. We present the macroscopic, microscopic and electron microscopy findings of cardiac transplant samples from a 36-year-old patient diagnosed with non-compacted myocardiopathy. This condition shows a high genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, with superposition of different phenotypes and variability in the hereditary patterns. Clinical diagnosis is established by coupling imaging results to clinical characteristics. The clinical manifestations of non-compacted myocardiopathy are variable, including arrhythmic events and variable degrees of cardiac failure, although some patients may be asymptomatic. In certain cases a heart transplant may be necessary. The differential diagnosis should be made with hypertrophic and dilated myocardiopathy. However, only a few reports can be found in the literature that discuss the pathology of this condition.

Análisis económico del tratamiento ambulatorio intermitente con levosimendán de la insuficiencia cardiaca avanzada en España / Economic analysis of intermittent intravenous outpatient treatment with levosimendan in advanced heart failure in Spain

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: La insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) avanzada conlleva altas tasas de hospitalización y mortalidad. El estudio LION-HEART fue un ensayo clínico aleatorizado y controlado con placebo que evaluó la eficacia y la seguridad de la administración intravenosa de dosis intermitentes de levosimendán en pacientes ambulatorios con IC avanzada. El objetivo del presente estudio es realizar un análisis de costes para determinar si la menor tasa de hospitalizaciones por IC observada en pacientes tratados con levosimendán en el estudio LION-HEART puede generar ahorros para el Sistema Nacional de Salud, en comparación con la opción de no tratar a los pacientes con IC avanzada. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un modelo económico que incluyó las tasas de hospitalización por IC del estudio LION-HEART y los costes de hospitalización por IC y de adquisición y administración intravenosa de levosimendán. El horizonte temporal del análisis fue de 12 meses. Se realizaron 2 análisis, uno determinístico y otro probabilístico (simulación de Monte Carlo de segundo orden). RESULTADOS: Según el análisis determinístico, el ahorro total por cada paciente tratado con levosimendán ascendería a -698,48 euros. En el análisis probabilístico, el ahorro por paciente tratado con levosimendán sería de -849,94 (IC95%, 133,12 a -2.255,31) euros. La probabilidad de que se produzcan ahorros con levosimendán en comparación con la opción de no tratar sería del 94,8%. CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento ambulatorio intermitente con levosimendán puede generar ahorros para el Sistema Nacional de Salud, en comparación con la opción de no tratar a los pacientes con IC avanzada

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced heart failure (HF) leads to high hospitalization and mortality rates. The LION-HEART study was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of intravenous administration of intermittent doses of levosimendan in outpatients with advanced HF. The aim of the present study was to perform a cost analysis to determine whether the lower rate of hospitalizations for HF, observed in patients treated with levosimendan in the LION-HEART study, can generate savings for the Spanish national health system compared with the option of not treating patients with advanced HF. METHODS: An economic model was used that included IC hospitalization rates from the LION-HEART study, the costs of hospitalization due to HF and those of the acquisition and intravenous administration of levosimendan. The time horizon of the analysis was 12 months. Two analyses were carried out, one deterministic and the other probabilistic (second-order Monte Carlo simulation). RESULTS: In the deterministic analysis, the total saving for each patient treated with levosimendan would amount to−€698.48. In the probabilistic analysis, the saving per patient treated with levosimendan would be−€849.94 (95%CI, €133.12 to−€2,255.31). The probability of savings with levosimendan compared with the no treatment option would be 94.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent ambulatory treatment with levosimendan can generate savings for the Spanish national health system compared with the option of not treating patients with advanced HF

Economic analysis of intermittent intravenous outpatient treatment with levosimendan in advanced heart failure in Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced heart failure (HF) leads to high hospitalization and mortality rates. The LION-HEART study was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of intravenous administration of intermittent doses of levosimendan in outpatients with advanced HF. The aim of the present study was to perform a cost analysis to determine whether the lower rate of hospitalizations for HF, observed in patients treated with levosimendan in the LION-HEART study, can generate savings for the Spanish national health system compared with the option of not treating patients with advanced HF. METHODS: An economic model was used that included IC hospitalization rates from the LION-HEART study, the costs of hospitalization due to HF and those of the acquisition and intravenous administration of levosimendan. The time horizon of the analysis was 12 months. Two analyses were carried out, one deterministic and the other probabilistic (second-order Monte Carlo simulation). RESULTS: In the deterministic analysis, the total saving for each patient treated with levosimendan would amount to-€698.48. In the probabilistic analysis, the saving per patient treated with levosimendan would be-€849.94 (95%CI, €133.12 to-€2,255.31). The probability of savings with levosimendan compared with the no treatment option would be 94.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent ambulatory treatment with levosimendan can generate savings for the Spanish national health system compared with the option of not treating patients with advanced HF.

La evolución de la hipertensión arterial pulmonar a lo largo de 30 años: experiencia de un centro de referencia / Trends in pulmonary hypertension over a period of 30 years: experience from a single referral centre

Introducción y objetivos: La hipertensión arterial pulmonar (HAP) se caracteriza por aumento de resistencias vasculares pulmonares, disfunción progresiva del ventrículo derecho y muerte. A pesar de los avances, sigue asociada a alta morbimortalidad. El objetivo del estudio es describir el tratamiento de esta enfermedad y determinar factores pronósticos de pacientes con HAP tratados en un centro de referencia nacional a lo largo de 30 años. Métodos: Se estudió a 379 pacientes consecutivos diagnosticados de HAP (enero de 1984-diciembre de 2014). Se los distribuyó en 3 intervalos de tiempo: previo a 2004, 2004-2009 y 2010-2014, y se analizaron los factores pronósticos de deterioro clínico. Resultados: La mediana de edad de los pacientes es 44 años (el 68,6% eran mujeres) y estaban en clase funcional III-IV el 72%. Se observó un incremento en etiologías más complejas: enfermedad venooclusiva e hipertensión portopulmonar en el último periodo. La terapia combinada de inicio aumentó (el 5% previo a 2004 frente al 27% posterior a 2010; p < 0,05). El análisis multivariable mostró como factores independientes de deterioro clínico edad, sexo, etiología y variables combinadas (p < 0,05). La supervivencia libre de muerte o trasplante al primero, el tercero y el quinto año fueron del 92,2, el 80,6 y el 68,5% respectivamente. La mediana de supervivencia fue 9 años (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 7,532-11,959). Conclusiones: La HAP es una enfermedad heterogénea y compleja. La mediana de supervivencia libre de muerte o trasplante en nuestra serie es 9 años. La estructura de una unidad multidisciplinaria de HAP debe adaptarse con rapidez a los cambios que se producen en el tiempo incorporando nuevas técnicas diagnósticas y terapéuticas (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by increased pulmonary vascular resistance, right ventricular dysfunction and death. Despite scientific advances, is still associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim is to describe the clinical approach and determine the prognostic factors of patients with PAH treated in a national reference center over 30 years. Methods: Three hundred and seventy nine consecutive patients with PAH (January 1984 to December 2014) were studied. Were divided into 3 periods of time: before 2004, 2004-2009 and 2010-2014. Prognostic factors (multivariate analysis) were analyzed for clinical deterioration. Results: Median age was 44 years (68.6% women), functional class III-IV: 72%. An increase was observed in more complex etiologies in the last period of time: Pulmonary venooclusive disease and portopulmonary hypertension. Upfront combination therapy significantly increased (5% before 2004 vs 27% after 2010; P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed prognostic significance in age, sex, etiology and combined clinical variables as they are independent predictors of clinical deterioration (P < .05). Survival free from death or transplantation for the 1st, 3rd and 5th year was 92.2%, 80.6% and 68.5% respectively. The median survival was 9 years (95% confidence interval, 7.532-11.959) Conclusions: The PAH is a heterogeneous and complex disease, the median survival free from death or transplantation in our series is 9 years after diagnosis. The structure of a multidisciplinary unit PAH must adapt quickly to changes that occur over time incorporating new diagnostic and therapeutic techniques (AU)

Trends in Pulmonary Hypertension Over a Period of 30 Years: Experience From a Single Referral Centre.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by increased pulmonary vascular resistance, right ventricular dysfunction and death. Despite scientific advances, is still associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim is to describe the clinical approach and determine the prognostic factors of patients with PAH treated in a national reference center over 30 years. METHODS: Three hundred and seventy nine consecutive patients with PAH (January 1984 to December 2014) were studied. Were divided into 3 periods of time: before 2004, 2004-2009 and 2010-2014. Prognostic factors (multivariate analysis) were analyzed for clinical deterioration. RESULTS: Median age was 44 years (68.6% women), functional class III-IV: 72%. An increase was observed in more complex etiologies in the last period of time: Pulmonary venooclusive disease and portopulmonary hypertension. Upfront combination therapy significantly increased (5% before 2004 vs 27% after 2010; P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed prognostic significance in age, sex, etiology and combined clinical variables as they are independent predictors of clinical deterioration (P < .05). Survival free from death or transplantation for the 1st, 3rd and 5th year was 92.2%, 80.6% and 68.5% respectively. The median survival was 9 years (95% confidence interval, 7.532-11.959) CONCLUSIONS: The PAH is a heterogeneous and complex disease, the median survival free from death or transplantation in our series is 9 years after diagnosis. The structure of a multidisciplinary unit PAH must adapt quickly to changes that occur over time incorporating new diagnostic and therapeutic techniques.